By Mazhar Iqbal/
By exterminating Guru India has facilitated the making of
another Kashmiri freedom hero. He was not a heroic figure like Maqbool Bhat
when he entered into Tihar Jail on allegations of facilitating an attack on
Indian Parliament, but became a hero when he was buried inside the jail
premises.Nobody including his fellow party members was willing to give him a
status equal to the founder of armed freedom struggle in Kashmir but India
herself did this job.
While Guru’s standing is not parallel to that of Bhat, he
can be another Maqbool Bhat in years to come. When Bhat was hanged to death in
1984, nobody in Indian government could envisage a strong reaction and violent
protests by people of Kashmir, especially his own party , the Jammu Kashmir
Liberation Front (JKLF).
Guru was neither the founder of the JKLF nor the top leader
of his party; he was a just an activist who had attempted to renounce militancy
more than once. Still, he can be a
catalyst for another spell of violent struggle against India’s brutal and
tyrannical rule in Jammu & Kashmir. There are suggestions that his figure
will raise high not because of a staunch and forceful expression of anger over
his death but by the pull factor of the state defensive policies vis-à-vis
Jammu & Kashmir.
Guru was a true embodiment of a person who lived all his
life struggling hard to reconcile with the nature of conflict that has shaped
since the revival of insurgency in Kashmir. The insurgency which Guru lived all
through his life was not available to Bhat, rather later himself became a
founder of violent struggle against oppressing rule. Bhat is revered not only
for his patriotism and heroic stature but also for his unfettered allegiance to
a cause. There is a clear deviation in characters of Guru and Bhat, but they
truly represent the nature of freedom struggle in their own times.
The political struggle in Guru’s time is not confined within
the charter and framework of a single revolutionary political party; it has
been more vigorously expressed by other segments of Kashmiri society than
freedom fighters themselves. It is not just one freedom fighter who with his
revolutionary mental approach does not want to blindly follow the authoritarian
rule but it is a whole generation that has gone through a first-hand experience
of militant struggle and counter-insurgency tactics of a strong
government. They are all passengers of a
same boat and they have personal experiences of the whole journey.
India took more than a decade to hang ‘the mastermind of an
attack on Indian Parliament’. There is a speculation that ‘the new hero’ of
Kashmiri’s freedom movement can attract more people toward militancy than
Maqbool Bhat. So, one can imagine where India will be in next two decades,
especially in a context of time taken to punish a ‘traitor’.
According to Indian government’s version Guru had provided
the major logistical support to the militants who had besieged Indian parliament.
Thus, he met his logical end, but, what India will do with another horde of
masterminds of future attacks. India did not hand over Guru’s body to his
relatives to avoid a possible anger in the region. This decision might have
been taken carefully after weighing the possible options. However, Indian
security establishment would be proved mistaken if the protest against the
execution prolongs.
When Bhat was hanged in 1984, nobody in India had been able
to predict that it would be an ignition for a scorching fire of militancy as
the decade of 90’s witnessed India burning in that fire.
Noted human rights activist and author Arundhati Roy and
many other critics have already described in detail how there were too many
loopholes in the Guru’s trial. It will be matter of shame for India’s secular
stature when historian will prove that by hanging one person India not only jumped
back into decades of anarchy but also pushed its own people toward rebellion
and hatred against the centre.
Apparently, the Indian security apparatus believes that Guru’s
execution will not have that kind of mass appeal as it was witnessed after
Bhat’s hanging. However, major political parties including Congress are worried
over this development. India is not in a
position to take it for granted that Guru’s hanging would not give a fresh
lease of life to the extremist groups operating in the valley and it will not
have negative impact on overall security situation in the northeast of the country.
In fact, the impact has started making its way. When Guru
was being hanged in Tihar Jail, Sonia Gandhi’s election campaign in northern
states was at full swing. In a blow to the campaign of opposition Congress for
the February 14 assembly polls in Tripura, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and
Congress supremo Sonia Gandhi have cancelled their trips. The prime minister has
also postponed his election campaign tour to Nagaland.
The government decision to bury Guru inside the Tihar Jail
is a beginning of a state defensive policy which India will be bound to follow
in coming months. Yet, the policy of avoiding a situation of mass outburst on
the streets of Srinagar and Sopore can be exercised for a short span of time
but not for ever.
(The writer is a peace and human rights activist and member
of Press for Peace.)
